Press ESC to close

Unrevealed XRP Memo Puts Ripple v. SEC Case in Spotlight

Hey there! Some links on this page are affiliate links which means that, if you choose to make a purchase, I may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. I greatly appreciate your support!


In the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a recent revelation by legal analyst John E. Deaton has shed new light on the case. Deaton has drawn attention to a 2018 internal memo from the SEC’s enforcement lawyers, which remains undisclosed due to privilege. However, the absence of any recommendation for action against Ripple for its sale of XRP tokens raises speculation about whether Ripple executives were aware of potential violations of securities laws. This development, along with commentary from legal expert Bill Morgan, questioning the SEC’s position on the intrinsic value of digital assets like XRP, adds further complexity to the case.

Unrevealed XRP Memo Puts Ripple v. SEC Case in Spotlight

The ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken a new turn with the revelation of an unrevealed XRP memo. This internal memo, dating back to 2018, has been brought to the spotlight by legal analyst John E. Deaton, raising questions about the SEC’s actions against Ripple. Additionally, the SEC’s position on intrinsic value and the classification of cryptocurrencies as commodities has also been critiqued by legal expert Bill Morgan. In this article, we will delve into the details of the Ripple v. SEC case, explore the concerns raised by Deaton and Morgan, and analyze the implications for the cryptocurrency industry.

Overview of Ripple v. SEC Case

The Ripple v. SEC case is a high-profile legal battle that commenced in December 2020 when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs Inc. and its executives Chris Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse. The lawsuit alleges that Ripple conducted an unregistered securities offering by selling XRP tokens, which the SEC considers to be securities. Ripple, on the other hand, argues that XRP is a cryptocurrency and therefore not subject to securities regulations. The outcome of this case is closely watched by the cryptocurrency industry as it could set a precedent for the classification of digital assets.

John E. Deaton Questions the 2018 Internal Memo

John E. Deaton, an attorney closely monitoring the Ripple v. SEC case, has raised interesting questions regarding a 2018 internal memo from the SEC’s enforcement lawyers. While the memo itself remains undisclosed due to privilege, Deaton suggests that the lack of recommendation against Ripple’s sale of XRP tokens implies that the SEC lawyers were not convinced that XRP should be classified as a security. This raises concerns about whether Ripple executives were aware of any potential violation of securities laws.

Bill Morgan Critiques the SEC’s Position on Intrinsic Value

Legal expert Bill Morgan has also voiced his opinion on the Ripple v. SEC case, specifically critiquing the SEC’s position on the intrinsic value of digital assets like XRP. Morgan argues that the SEC’s focus on intrinsic value overlooks the fact that the value of a digital asset can be derived from its functionality and uses. He suggests that the SEC’s intent to establish that digital assets lack intrinsic value simplifies their job in applying the Howey Test, a legal framework used to determine if an investment contract exists. This critique highlights the complexities surrounding the classification of cryptocurrencies and their underlying value.

SEC’s Pushback on the Notion of Cryptocurrencies as Commodities

In addition to the aforementioned critiques, the SEC has been pushing back against the notion that cryptocurrencies should be classified as commodities. Traditionally, commodities like gold or oil have a physical presence, while cryptocurrencies exist solely in digital form. The SEC’s argument is that digital assets cannot be treated in the same way as physical commodities due to their intangible nature. This argument further adds to the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.

SEC’s Availability for Trial in 2024

The SEC recently informed the court that it is available for trial in April, May, and June 2024, after filing a request for an appeal. This further prolongs the legal battle between Ripple and the SEC, pushing the resolution of the case several years into the future. The extended timeline has significant implications for Ripple and the broader cryptocurrency industry, as it delays the clarity and regulatory certainty that market participants have been seeking.

Author Background

The author of this article, Alex Dovbnya, is a cryptocurrency expert, trader, and journalist with extensive experience covering the industry. Alex has authored over 1,000 stories for various fintech media outlets, including U.Today and CryptoComes. His expertise lies in regulatory trends and the future of digital assets. For any inquiries or further information, Alex can be contacted at

XRP Price Analysis for August 27

On August 27, the price of XRP experienced fluctuations in response to the ongoing Ripple v. SEC case. However, it is important to note that the price analysis provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. The outcome of the legal battle between Ripple and the SEC can have a significant impact on the price and future of XRP.

Binance Puts Cristiano Ronaldo to Test With Lie Detector Challenge

In a separate development, cryptocurrency exchange Binance has put football superstar Cristiano Ronaldo to the test with a lie detector challenge. This unique and engaging marketing campaign aims to attract attention to the exchange and increase awareness about cryptocurrencies among a wider audience. The involvement of high-profile individuals like Cristiano Ronaldo highlights the increasing mainstream adoption and integration of cryptocurrencies into popular culture.

Litecoin (LTC) Payments Surge 50% as Network Reaches New Milestone

Litecoin (LTC) payments have surged by 50% as the network achieves a new milestone. This indicates an increasing acceptance and usage of Litecoin as a medium of exchange. As more merchants and individuals adopt Litecoin for transactions, the network’s utility and value proposition continue to grow. The surge in Litecoin payments demonstrates the increasing demand for cryptocurrencies and their practical applications in everyday life.

Newsletter Subscription

To stay up to date with the latest news, developments, and price analysis in the cryptocurrency industry, consider subscribing to our newsletter. Our daily newsletter provides a comprehensive overview of the crypto market, including top news, fresh interviews, and insightful price analysis. By subscribing, you will receive all the essential information you need to navigate the dynamic world of cryptocurrencies.

In conclusion, the unrevealed XRP memo has put the Ripple v. SEC case in the spotlight, raising questions about the SEC’s actions and Ripple’s potential knowledge of securities law violations. Legal experts have also critiqued the SEC’s position on intrinsic value and the classification of cryptocurrencies as commodities. The extended timeline for the trial further adds to the uncertainty surrounding the case. As the legal battle continues, it is crucial for market participants and industry stakeholders to closely follow the developments and implications for the cryptocurrency industry as a whole.